Global brokerage UBS upgrades Vodafone Idea to buy, setting target at Rs 18, citing potential relief on government dues and expected mobile price increase. Stock jumps over 5% to Rs 14.82.
Telecom operator today found another backer when global broking firm upgraded the to buy with a of Rs 18, saying that it is expecting relief on as well as a . Following the , the stock jumped over 5% to Rs 14.82."We believe the market is pricing in a 15-20% mobile price increase in the coming 12-24 months as VIL FPO comes to a close and and are incentivised to prioritise ROIC over market share gains. That said, we believe relief in the form of by the or , moratoriums etc by the Government is highly likely, especially given the Government's stated objective of ensuring three viable private telcos," said.
VIL, it said, is the most leveraged to any such relief, yet the stock is trading at a similar c11x FY26e EV/EBITDA as Airtel and Jio. "We believe risk-reward is attractive going into any such announcement and upgrade to Buy. Maintain Neutral on and ," it said.
Also read |
VIL's annual payment to the government will be over $5 billion from FY26 onwards, including US$2bn for AGR and US$3bn for spectrum.
"Looking at the details of a curative petition filed by telcos on the AGR case, we believe as much as 50-75% of AGR dues could potentially be cancelled for VIL. Assuming AGR dues are completely waived, our DCF value could increase to Rs 24 per share, vs Rs 12 when there are no waivers," UBS said.
Earlier Japanese broking firm had also upgraded the stock to neutral from a reduce rating with a revised target price of Rs 15 from Rs 6.5.
"We note the outlook for the industry has improved considerably with all players aligned on the need for ARPU hikes and the industry setting into a 3-private player market. We trim our FY25F EBITDA by 2% and raise FY26F EBITDA by 6%, on factoring in lower subscriber losses," Nomura analyst Hemang Khanna had said.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)
Source: Stocks-Markets-Economic Times