JPMorgan continues to favour SBI with an overweight rating, while Macquarie has boosted Escorts to an outperform status. Conversely, CLSA has downgraded Sula to underperform following Q4 results, and they're sticking with a sell rating on Asian Paints.
Brokerage JPMorgan an overweight on and Macquarie Escorts to . downgraded to while maintaining a on post Q4 results.We have collated a list of recommendations from top brokerage firms from ETNow and other sources:
JPMorgan on SBI: Overweight| Target Rs 1000
JPMorgan maintained an overweight rating on but raised the price to Rs 1000 from Rs 725 earlier.
The FY24 print shows that the growth and the return on equity (ROE) gap to private banks has closed out.
The global investment bank expects a similar dynamic to sustain this year as well.
Positioning is enviable with a growth pick-up in corporate loans, low pressure on opex, and a favourable asset quality environment.
Despite potentially lower recovery income in FY25, we think the bank can continue to print 1%+ ROA.
CLSA on Sula: Underperform| Target Rs 515
CLSA downgraded Sula to underperform from a buy and also slashed the target price to Rs 515 from Rs 819 earlier.
The key markets may impact future growth. Margins were disappointed in Q4 due to higher other expenses.
Macquarie on Escorts: Outperform| Target Rs 3880
Macquarie upgraded to outperform from neutral and also raised the target price to Rs 3880 from Rs 2960 earlier.
FY25E should see domestic tractor demand recovery. The management expects exports to pick up in FY25.
The global investment bank expects a margin improvement to 13.6% in FY25.
CLSA on Asian Paints: Sell| Target Rs 2337
CLSA maintained a sell rating on Asian Paints but slashed the target price to Rs 2337 from Rs 2410 earlier.
The top-line growth is in negative territory, and there is contraction in margins. All eyes are on competitive activity in the sector.
The value growth will likely continue to lag volume growth due to price cuts taken in FY24.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Source: Stocks-Markets-Economic Times