PepsiCo can be sued over health claims for Gatorade protein bars, judge says

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP ) can be sued for marketing its Gatorade protein bars as good for you though they have more sugar than protein and more sugar than typical candy bars, a federal judge ruled.

In a decision on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Casey Pitts in San Jose, California said three self-described fitness enthusiasts leading a proposed class action plausibly alleged that PepsiCo's marketing and labeling was deceptive.

Neither PepsiCo nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment.

Not all protein bars are equal in nutritional benefits.

PepsiCo was accused last September of violating federal and state consumer protection laws by creating a "health halo" around Gatorade bars, including assurances they "help muscles rebuild," are "used by the pros" and are "backed by science."

According to the lawsuit, the bars are actually "fortified junk food" with 29 grams of sugar, including 28 grams of added sugar -- more than the American Heart Association's recommended 25 gram daily limit for women -- and just 20 grams of protein.

The plaintiffs said excess consumption of added sugar is linked to high rates of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

They said they wouldn't have bought Gatorade bars or would have paid less had they understood their nutritional character, and are seeking unspecified damages.

PepsiCo called the deception claims "implausible" because it did not market the bars as healthy or low in sugar, especially for flavors such as Chocolate Chip and Cookies and Cream.

Pitts, however, said reasonable consumers might be unable to readily interpret the sugar content on labels, and be misled by PepsiCo's "self-proclaimed science-backed claims."

The judge also agreed that PepsiCo can make health- and protein-content claims consistent with federal regulations.

He said, for example, that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not consider sugar a "disqualifying ingredient" when making health claims.

Maia Kats, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said they welcomed the decision and would continue pursuing their claims.



PepsiCo is based in Purchase, New York. Its dozens of brands also include Fritos, Lay's, Mountain Dew and Ocean Spray.

The case is McCausland et al v PepsiCo Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 23-04526.

Source: Investing.com

Publicații recente
UBS chair warns against big increase in capital requirements, newspaper reports
29.09.2024 - 02:00
Steward Health CEO who refused to testify to US Senate will step down
28.09.2024 - 23:00
Exclusive-TPG in lead to buy stake in Creative Planning at $15 billion valuation, sources say
28.09.2024 - 22:00
US southeast faces daunting clean up from Helene; death toll rises
28.09.2024 - 22:00
UniCredit CEO Orcel attended virtual meeting with Commerzbank, source says
28.09.2024 - 17:00
Online sellers on Walmart's Flipkart sue India watchdog over antitrust probe
28.09.2024 - 16:00
If your AI seems smarter​, it's thanks to smarter human trainers
28.09.2024 - 15:00
Thyssenkrupp steel head prepares staff for 'tough' cuts
28.09.2024 - 15:00
Why gene therapy for sickle cell is slow to catch on with patients
28.09.2024 - 15:00
Here's how Morgan Stanley expects the US election to impact textile retailers
28.09.2024 - 13:00
How to prepare your portfolio for Q4
28.09.2024 - 12:00
Why Wells Fargo says investors have key decisions to make amid Fed easing cycle
28.09.2024 - 11:00
Nuclear power renaissance on the way: UBS
28.09.2024 - 11:00
Investing.com's stocks of the week
28.09.2024 - 11:00
Apple drops out of talks to join OpenAI investment round, WSJ reports
28.09.2024 - 09:00

© Analytic DC. All Rights Reserved.

new
Prezentare generală a pieței Cheltuielile de consum din SUA au înregistrat o creștere moderată în august
Bine ați venit în mesageria de suport!!
*
*

Solicitarea dvs. a fost trimisă cu succes!
Veți fi contactat în scurt timp.