Patanjali Foods shares fall 5% after SC summons Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balakrishna

The apex court summoned the duo after Patanjali Ayurved failed to file a reply to a contempt notice issued to the company. The case is related to alleged misleading advertisements published by the company for its traditional ayurvedic medicines which claim to cure certain diseases.

Shares of cracked over 5% on Tuesday following the Supreme Court (SC)issued a show-cause notice to yoga guru and and directed them to appear before it. The apex court summoned the duo after Patanjali Ayurved failed to file a reply to a contempt notice issued to the company.

Patanjali Ayurved is co-founded by Ramdev, while Balakrishna is the Managing Director of the company.

The case is related to alleged misleading advertisements published by the company for its traditional ayurvedic medicines which claim to cure certain diseases.

Earlier, the SC barred the consumer firm from publishing advertisements for its traditional ayurvedic medicines.

The company later issued a statement saying that the SC's order did not relate to Patanjali Foods (PFL) which is an independent listed entity and operates in the space of edible oil and food FMCG products only. It further said that the observations do not have any bearing on the regular business operations or the financial performance of Patanjali
Foods.

The apex court order came on the back of an ongoing legal dispute with the Indian Medical Association (IMA), which has accused Patanjali of allegedly disparaging other forms of conventional medicines. The court said Patanjali violated its assurance to judges last year in the ongoing case that it would not publish advertisements that make "casual statements claiming medicinal efficacy".

The IMA told the court that Ramdev's firm continued to publish newspaper ads claiming to offer a "permanent solution" for conditions, such as blood pressure, asthma, and diabetes, the Reuters report said.

Also Read:

Ramdev had previously denied the criticism and accused some doctors of spreading propaganda against traditional medicines, which are hugely popular in India.
Last month, India's top court pulled up Patanjali for prima facie violation of the undertaking it had given in the court about its products and statements claiming their medicinal efficacy. The court had then issued a notice to the company seeking its reply on why contempt proceedings should not be initiated.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)

Source: Stocks-Markets-Economic Times

Publicații recente
3 reasons why US may slip into a recession over the next 12 months
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway offloads more of its Bank of America stake
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Here's how the stock market typically performs in October
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Nokia says German court rules in its favour in Amazon patent dispute
20.09.2024 - 16:00
All you need to know about Fed easing cycles
20.09.2024 - 16:00
PodcastOne executive chairman buys $16,380 in company stock
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Here's how B Riley has started its coverage of internet names Snap and Reddit
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Morgan Stanley latest to downgrade ASML on China, memory, Intel concerns
20.09.2024 - 16:00
VinFast posts deeper Q2 loss on impairment charge, higher cost to boost sales
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Trump Media slides as lock-up expires
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Can the S&P 500 momentum continue?
20.09.2024 - 16:00
Sanofi's tolebrutinib drug delays progressive MS by 31% in trial
20.09.2024 - 15:00
Factbox-US companies to hire thousands of seasonal workers for holiday season
20.09.2024 - 15:00
FedEx, PepsiCo, Trump Media fall premarket; Nike rises
20.09.2024 - 15:00
Vietnamese EV maker VinFast reports wider sequential gross loss
20.09.2024 - 15:00

© Analytic DC. All Rights Reserved.

new
Analiza pieței Analiza complexǎ a petrolului WTI
Bine ați venit în mesageria de suport!!
*
*

Solicitarea dvs. a fost trimisă cu succes!
Veți fi contactat în scurt timp.