Kraft Heinz must face Mac & Cheese lawsuit, judge rules

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal judge said Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC ) must face a proposed nationwide class action alleging that it defrauded consumers by claiming its Kraft macaroni and cheese, one of its best-known products, contains no artificial preservatives.

In a decision on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland said the Illinois, California and New York consumers leading the lawsuit plausibly alleged that Kraft Mac & Cheese contained a synthetic form of citric acid that differed from the natural variety, and also contained sodium phosphates.

The Chicago-based judge said the plaintiffs specifically alleged that the ingredients functioned as preservatives, making Kraft Heinz's claim of "No Artificial Flavors, Preservatives or Dyes" on labels false, and cited academic studies and U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance to support their case.

"These allegations are enough to withstand a motion to dismiss," she wrote.

Rowland agreed with Kraft Heinz that the plaintiffs lacked standing to demand new labels because they are now aware of its alleged deceptive practices and face no risk of future harm.

In seeking a dismissal, Kraft Heinz said there were no factual allegations that it used artificial preservatives in its "iconic" Mac & Cheese, or that reasonable consumers would view its ingredients as artificial.

Kraft Heinz and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The plaintiffs are seeking damages for fraud, unjust enrichment, and violations of state consumer protection laws.

Their lawsuit is one of many challenging the accuracy or precision of food labels.

In July 2023, a Miami federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Kraft Heinz of understating how long it took to prepare microwaveable Velveeta macaroni and cheese.



Kraft Heinz is based in Chicago and Pittsburgh. Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRKa ) owns 26.9% of its stock.

The case is Hayes et al v. Kraft Heinz Co, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 23-16596.

Source: Investing.com

Последние публикации
Analysis-Contentious COP29 deal shows climate cooperation fraying at edges
25.11.2024 - 07:00
Analysis-Business seeks details in face of mixed COP29 climate messages
25.11.2024 - 07:00
Adani bonds slide to year low as investors and lenders weigh bribery allegations
25.11.2024 - 07:00
Australia stocks higher at close of trade; S&P/ASX 200 up 0.28%
25.11.2024 - 07:00
Adani shares rise; CFO says publicly listed firms not subject to US indictment
25.11.2024 - 06:00
Asia stocks jump on gains in cyclical sectors, US optimism
25.11.2024 - 06:00
Australia PM plays down privacy fears of social media ban for children
25.11.2024 - 05:00
Adani bonds slide to year low as investors weigh bribery allegations
25.11.2024 - 05:00
Apple’s China suppliers rally as CEO Cook appears in Beijing
25.11.2024 - 05:00
US stock futures rise as Trump picks Bessent for Treasury role
25.11.2024 - 04:00
'Wicked,' 'Gladiator II' bring in $270.2 million in global box office
25.11.2024 - 04:00
Webush upgrades Snowflake, Elastic to Outperform on AI optimism
25.11.2024 - 04:00
Australia’s SG Fleet jumps on $785 mln takeover bid from Pacific Equity Partners
25.11.2024 - 04:00
Trump's FDA pick Makary boosts BioPharma confidence, says BMO
25.11.2024 - 04:00
Air New Zealand sees lower earnings for first half of 2025 as engine issues persist
25.11.2024 - 04:00

© Analytic DC. All Rights Reserved.

new
Анализ рынка Как повлият завтра отчет NFP на курс доллара США?